Thep Urai - Fotolia
WebRTC development is an evolving ecosystem of browser-based communications, driven mainly by browser vendors. Based on the vendors' roadmaps, we can expect to see several areas of progress in the coming year.
1. Video codecs: WebRTC browser implementations will support a range of codecs. H.264 will be available in all WebRTC-supported browsers, like Google Chrome and Mozilla Firefox, by the end of the year. The VP8 codec will be available as well, though slightly later on Microsoft Edge. The VP9 codec will be available in Chrome and Firefox.
2. New media flows: MediaRecorder has been implemented in Chrome and Firefox and allows local recording of media in the browser. MediaStream relay capabilities enable running a small-scale media server inside the browser.
3. Object real-time communications: ORTC-related APIs and capabilities will continue to trickle into WebRTC browser implementations. This means the tension between WebRTC and ORTC should ebb, especially now that Microsoft plans to support WebRTC 1.0 in Edge. It also means that new features and capabilities might not be added to the SDP layer of WebRTC but introduced via the object model defined in ORTC.
4. Mobile investments: The main focus of mobile WebRTC development will be getting the technology to work as a software developer's kit (SDK) embedded into mobile applications.
6. Debugging: More debugging tools will become available, especially with Chrome where test.webrtc.org has been introduced along with an internal events log for better troubleshooting.
WebRTC development should show continued improvement to the technology in 2016. That improvement should take place all over its technology stack -- from optimizations in network and media processing to the introduction of new capabilities. UC vendors need to continue their investment in their core use of WebRTC and explore these new capabilities from browser vendors.
Do you have a question for Tsahi Levent-Levi or any other experts? Ask your enterprise-specific questions today! (All questions are treated anonymously.)
WebRTC browser incompatibility slows adoption
WebRTC video codecs compete for dominance
WebRTC library boosted by servers, platforms and SDKs
Dig Deeper on Communication Integration with Enterprise Applications
Related Q&A from Tsahi Levent-Levi
Adding communications capabilities to your web browsers or mobile apps? Be sure to use the right protocols for successful interoperability with your ... Continue Reading
Organizations can take two approaches to measure WebRTC quality, both of which assess real-time communications performance on end-user devices and ... Continue Reading
Understanding the potential issues that could affect the performance of WebRTC apps starts with knowing which factors to look at and how they ... Continue Reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.