Choose the right WAN technology for VoIP

Choose the right WAN technology for VoIP

 

Choose the right WAN technology for VoIP
Tom Lancaster

If you're implementing a WAN and you plan to use Voice over IP, you should give special consideration to the technology you use. Each technology has some advantages and some disadvantages and they also have different levels of efficiency because, among other things, they all have different header structures. There is an inverse relationship between header size and efficiency: the larger the header the lower the efficiency.

To understand this, remember that the smaller your packets, the less time it takes to process them. This is particularly important with delay. Also, there is a finite amount of bandwidth on any given link. The more bandwidth is consumed by headers, the less bandwidth can be consumed by the payload (your data). Efficiency is good, so, with all other things being equal, the technologies with smaller headers will yield better quality voice than technologies with larger headers.

As an example, by taking the estimated number of voice packets per second, multiplied by the output rate of the CODEC plus the headers, we can calculate how much data we will transmit per second. So a Point-to-Point Protocol PPP frame has a 6-byte header and a Frame Relay header is 4 bytes. An ATM cell is fixed at 53 bytes; headers take up 5. If we compare these three common WAN technologies using the G.729A CODEC at a default rate of 50 packets per second, we see

    Requires Free Membership to View

    SearchUnifiedCommunications.com members gain immediate and unlimited access breaking industry news, expert advice on UC, technical guides, and more -- all at no cost. Join me on SearchUnifiedCommunications.com today!

    Kate Gerwig, Editorial Director

    By submitting your registration information to SearchUnifiedCommunications.com you agree to receive email communications from TechTarget and TechTarget partners. We encourage you to read our Privacy Policy which contains important disclosures about how we collect and use your registration and other information. If you reside outside of the United States, by submitting this registration information you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Your use of SearchUnifiedCommunications.com is governed by our Terms of Use. You may contact us at webmaster@TechTarget.com.

that a single conversation will take 25.6 Kbps of bandwidth on a Frame Relay link, 26.4 Kbps of bandwidth on a PPP link, and a whopping 42.4 Kbps of bandwidth on an ATM link.

Of course, efficiency isn't everything. All that header-space in ATM buys you something fairly deterministic, and in a congested network, that can be much more important than the relative efficiency.


Thomas Alexander Lancaster IV is a consultant and author with over ten years experience in the networking industry, focused on Internet infrastructure.


This was first published in November 2001

Disclaimer: Our Tips Exchange is a forum for you to share technical advice and expertise with your peers and to learn from other enterprise IT professionals. TechTarget provides the infrastructure to facilitate this sharing of information. However, we cannot guarantee the accuracy or validity of the material submitted. You agree that your use of the Ask The Expert services and your reliance on any questions, answers, information or other materials received through this Web site is at your own risk.