Home > Video conferencing codec primer
What you need to know:
EMAIL THIS

Video conferencing codec primer

03 Sep 2009 | Staff editors

Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us   

Understanding video conferencing codecs
Codecs are essential to video conferencing technology; they allow participants to see and hear those on the other end in real time. Because video conferencing uses both video and voice codecs to encode and decode transmissions, both must be considered when evaluating video conferencing equipment.

Why you need to know about codecs
Before investing in video conferencing, communications and IT professionals should understand the issues around codecs and how they factor into the rest of their unified communications and IT environment. The codecs built into the equipment you select today will affect who can use the system, with whom, and on what devices they can communicate, and the other applications that can interface with the system for years to come.

What you need to know about codecs
Video conferencing systems give the illusion of talking in person because they can compress and decompress digital streams of audio and video streams in real time. The device or software that performs this function is called a codec, short for coder/decoder or compression/decompression. There are hundreds of codecs available, which can make choosing the appropriate equipment difficult. They vary according to encoding techniques, supported bit rates, audio frequency spectrum, image resolution and frame rate. Matching these specifications to conferencing needs will start communications professionals on the right path. But the main challenge is ensuring that users at every endpoint of the system can interoperate, which means that their codecs must be compatible.

Should you invest in video conferencing? Read our guide to video conferencing ROI, TCO and QoS.
Some codecs are ITU-defined standards; these include the video codecs H.261, H.263 and H.264 or MPEG-4 and the voice codecs G.711, G.729, G.723.1, G.726, G.722 and G.728. Many codecs are proprietary and work only with a certain system or application. Most telepresence and high-definition systems use proprietary codecs because these have been refined to work exceptionally well and deliver optimal quality. Lower-end and personal video conferencing systems are more likely to be standards-based. These systems are typically more flexible and can work over varied networks with many types of endpoints.

Video conferencing systems must have three elements in common in order to function:

  1. Users on all endpoints of the conference must be able to initiate a connection by using the same call setup protocol. Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) has emerged as the enterprise standard for initiating enterprise video conferencing and other unified communications applications.

  2. Users must share a compatible video codec. In order to see the others, each user must be able to compress and decompress images using the same technology. The video conferencing industry is moving toward standardizing on codec H.264, which was developed to provide high-quality video at lower bandwidth over a wide range of networks and systems. The ITU-T standard for H.264 is also known as the ISO/IEC standard for MPEG-4 Advanced Video Coding; the two are jointly maintained to have identical technical content.

  3. Users also must have compatible voice codecs at each end of the conference to code and decode sound. The most common codecs for digitizing voice are G.711 and G.722. The emergence today of high-definition voice is causing changes in this technology, however.

While many vendors are moving toward standards and interoperability, there are still many codec options for vendors to include in their products and for customers to navigate. Products often support multiple codecs or "flavors" of the same codec, but that means maintaining multiple algorithms and code tables in the device or software memory. Switching between codecs also creates complexity, delays call setup, and increases the frequency of errors.

Proprietary codecs often require licensing fees and administrative overhead, adding another layer of cost and inconvenience. Some codecs require users to pay royalties whenever they are used. These codecs generally appear in reputable products known for reliability and scalability, but usage can be costly. Royalty-free codecs, such as the recently released SILK from Skype, which can be integrated into products at negligible cost.

The Scalable Video Codec (SVC) extension to the H.264 standard is helping to eliminate some complexity by allowing transmissions to rely on the original encoded stream, which can then be decoded with minimal software on a wide range of clients, such as PDAs and cell phones. SVC may someday eliminate the need for video conferencing gateways and multipoint control units (MCUs) to bridge multiple users.

For more background on video conferencing technology in general, visit our video conferencing tutorial.

Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us   



RELATED CONTENT
Video and Web Conferencing
Enterprise video streaming products: Internal YouTube with security
Polycom delivers large-scale multipoint video conferencing
Cisco-Tandberg merger finally makes enterprise video mainstream
Cisco-Tandberg deal could create conflict inside IT organizations
Enterprise video gains usage but must be used wisely to be effective
Recession generates interest, adoption in video conferencing
Winning users over to video conferencing
Telepresence is the next best thing to being there
Video conferencing: ROI, TCO and QoS
Google Wave, Cisco WebEx fill demand for hosted unified communications

SIP and Unified Communications Standards
What is the difference between a proxy server and B2BUA when it comes to SIP? How can I decide which one I should go for?
Cisco-Tandberg merger finally makes enterprise video mainstream
Cisco-Tandberg deal could create conflict inside IT organizations
What is the difference between H.323 and SIP?
UC: A good investment in a down economy – Event Q&As, part one
The significance of Avaya's Aura
Reality Check: Five things you should know about SIP
VoiceCon 2009 coverage
Avaya bets big on SIP with its vision for Aura Session Manager
Aside from SIP, what are the other key architectural attributes for a successful unified communications (UC) deployment?

Presence and Real-Time Communications
Enterprise social networking may enhance, not yet replace, presence
Primer: Presence technology in unified communications
Presence protocols and best practices
Presence and the anywhere office in a UC strategy
Presence, IM power mobile UC with or without fixed mobile convergence
Reality Check: Enterprise IM security and social networking security
Top 20 unified communications and IP telephony questions and answers 2008
Presence: The heart of unified communications
Workers demand the flexibility of unified communications in the cloud
Is unified communications presence good enough?

RELATED GLOSSARY TERMS
Terms from Whatis.com − the technology online dictionary
real-time communications  (SearchUnifiedCommunications.com)
RoundTable  (SearchUnifiedCommunications.com)

RELATED RESOURCES
2020software.com, trial software downloads for accounting software, ERP software, CRM software and business software systems
Search Bitpipe.com for the latest white papers and business webcasts
Whatis.com, the online computer dictionary




Business Communications for Collaboration
About Us  |  Contact Us  |  For Advertisers  |  For Business Partners  |  Site Index  |  RSS
SEARCH 
TechTarget provides technology professionals with the information they need to perform their jobs - from developing strategy, to making cost-effective purchase decisions and managing their organizations' technology projects - with its network of technology-specific websites, events and online magazines.

TechTarget Corporate Web Site  |  Media Kits  |  Site Map




All Rights Reserved, Copyright 2008 - 2009, TechTarget | Read our Privacy Policy
  TechTarget - The IT Media ROI Experts