Should you roll out a unified communications system at once or gradually?

Digg This!     StumbleUpon     Del.icio.us

RELATED CONTENT Unified messaging and UC with Tony Bradley As unified communications moves toward a software-based solution, do you see a demise in use of certain hardware tools, such as the desk phone, in the future? Does OCS need to be in place before these UM features can be realized via SP1? What's the difference between unified messaging and instant messaging? Will encrypting UC traffic negatively affect availability? What's the difference between collaboration and web conferencing? Does an organization have to have an IP PBX in order to have a unified communications system? Integrating Unified Communications apps into an existing infrastructure. What is communication-enabled business processes (CEBP)? IVR and diaster recovery Comparing and contrasting enterprise 2.0 and web 2.0 within the context of unified communications

RELATED RESOURCES 2020software.com, trial software downloads for accounting software, ERP software, CRM software and business software systems Search Bitpipe.com for the latest white papers and business webcasts Whatis.com, the online computer dictionary

Either approach will work. Often, for both financial and operational reasons, organizations use a phased approach. The modular nature of unified communications makes it very easy to implement gradually.

However, even when using a phased implementation, you have to know what the goal is. In other words, you should still take the time to do the research and develop a comprehensive plan for what the architecture of your ultimate unified communications infrastructure will look like, and then implement the components over time to achieve that goal.

If you start purchasing and implementing components without having the ultimate UC goal in mind, you could run into problems integrating components with each other or with your existing network architecture. The consequences of pushing on blindly could range from nothing, to costly re-engineering to integrate the different phases, to being unable to make it work and having to go back to square one to implement a properly engineered solution.