 |
|
|
| > |
QUESTION POSED ON: 06 October 2005
How do you define convergence? It seems each vendor has a different way to describe converged networks whether it be all information carried on a single network, or all applications on one network. I've also seen converged networks defined as public pared with private networks or wireless combined with wired networks.
|
|
|
To continue reading for free, register below or login
To read more you must become a member of SearchUnifiedCommunications.com
It depends on the context. But from my perspective, convergence is when you are able to use the same reference model to explain how to carry and integrate disparate contents like voice, video, data, asynchronous communications with synchronous conversations (store and forward, real time, near real time, etc) under a the same set of rules, attributes and protocols.. There is a "how" and there is a "result." The how is the way in which you implement convergence at every ISO layer. Same cable, same protocol, etc., and the results are, simplicity, interoperability, media independence, end-device independence, process integration, among others.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search and Browse the Expert Answer Center
Search and browse more than 25,000 question and
answer pairs from more than 250 TechTarget industry experts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
