The key decision is whether to adopt a PBX-centric approach (for companies where most of the staff involved are office based, and where improvements in responsiveness are mainly in fixed locations, e.g. call centers, HQ); or a mobile carrier-oriented approach, which can often be hosted by a mobile operator and is optimized for staff who are usually on the road or remote. A third option is centered on Wi-Fi and is strong for companies with significant WLANs in their offices and/or large numbers of home-based or on-the-road employees. They will require dual model cellular/Wi-Fi handsets and good access to Wi-Fi. These solutions are less tested than the other two approaches but are easy to set up, relatively low-cost and scalable. Fixed and mobile messaging and mail systems are seamlessly integrated using Wi-Fi and Unlicensed Mobile Access (UMA) though without integration with the PBX some enterprise features are lost.
Strong contenders for mobile UC include:• PBX-oriented Aastra (teamed with Ericsson), Avaya, Cisco, Shoretel
• Carrier-hosted: AT&T, BT, T-Mobile, Orange
• Wi-Fi: Aruba and Meru
• PBX Adjunct: Agito, RIM, Divitas (add functionality but only to certain PBXs)
• Mobile operator Adjunct: Kineto, Tango (add functionality but only to certain mobile systems)
• Others: Nokia, Nokia/Cisco, IBM, Microsoft, DME
Dig deeper on Mobile Unified Communications
Related Q&A from Caroline Gabriel -- Retired Expert
The economic downturn has adversely affected most IT markets -- but has it affected the mobile unified communications market? Find out in this expert...continue reading
Learn how to ensure mobile security in this expert response from Caroline Gabriel.continue reading
Learn about the benefits virtualizing enterprise applications on mobile devices, including information on VMware and Cisco.continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.