Q
Problem solve Get help with specific problems with your technologies, process and projects.

Enterprise social software: Should I pay for a vendor-based client?

Should businesses invest in internal, vendor-based enterprise social software or stick with free, public social networking clients? UC expert Paul McMillan weighs in.

We're a large, globally dispersed company. We're finding that our employees are using consumer-based social networking sites like Facebook, Chatter, LinkedIn and even Google+ now. What steps should I take to assess the potential value-add of investing in a vendor-based social networking client versus sticking with free, public social networking sites, as they seem to be serving our needs adequately enough? Or should I use some combination of both?

This scenario is very common today within most large enterprises. Making use of publicly available social software...

sites generally occurs virally for a number of reasons. Employees see it as a better way to communicate with each other. Existing tools may not provide that global reach that employees require. It's likely that many enterprises don't provide any tools that facilitate global collaboration. A couple of key elements take precedence when deciding whether to continue with an existing platform or move to an enterprise social software platform.

First and foremost: What are the goals of using such a platform? If employees have begun to use social software on their own, you will need to understand how they are using it. Are they building a knowledge base using wikis? Are they using it as a means to exchange ideas on a variety of company-related topics? Are employees using the platform to criticize company direction or policy? Another key consideration: What corporate compliance and security elements must be maintained? If your specific environment has heavy compliance mandates, that will impact your decision on which form of social networking you wish to implement.

In my experience, companies are best served with a combination of both approaches. An internal platform gives users a full range of social tools to utilize and facilitates linking these tools with back-office elements like directories, databases and document management systems. This allows knowledge and content to be more easily captured and maintained for future use. Most of these platforms offer connectivity to public platforms, which allows companies to manage and monitor their corporate image.

Whichever approach you take, it's important to implement common-sense guidelines to using social software. Too much control stifles collaboration and innovation, resulting in reduced benefits for the company. On the other hand, however, too little control can result in abuse of the platform by some employees, providing the same result.

Have a question for Paul McMillan? Send an e-mail to editor@searchunifiedcommunications.com.

This was last published in December 2011

Dig Deeper on Social Networking for Business

PRO+

Content

Find more PRO+ content and other member only offers, here.

Have a question for an expert?

Please add a title for your question

Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.

You will be able to add details on the next page.

Start the conversation

Send me notifications when other members comment.

By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy

Please create a username to comment.

-ADS BY GOOGLE

SearchCRM

SearchNetworking

SearchSDN

SearchTelecom

SearchITChannel

Close